![]() It took an hour and a half to install because Adobe have set up the installer so it won't work with Vista 64 Ultimate which we use on our video/photo workstation. I read the reviews about Adobe Lightroom5 and rushed out to buy it. It still isn't and I can't find the documentation to implement the integration. There are other issues such as when I installed Audition I expected it to be integrated automatically into Premiere for audio. The Cloud subscription model is annoying to many for example. A bigger problem is communication with a massive corporation like Adobe. It is a great application or set of applications, but a bit clunky. Seen from here Audition would benefit from a bit of a Spring-clean, speaking as someone who is not familiar with its history. Fear of adding a tiny smear of random noise down in the minus lots is far outweighed by my fear of what I know truncation can do to clean digital audio. ![]() I agreed with most of what he said, but not with everything about dither. I saw Steve_G's helpful response on the Adobe forum to which I have replied. As I mentioned above, Audition has a slightly "clunky" interface, however, as rumleymusic pointed out, batch conversion is a dream and the tools are good, if you think of it as a "tool box", it's very powerful and does a great job. The way that when you want to edit aftereffects or graphics pulled into premiere, it automatically opens up Photoshop or After Effects and on saving the changes are immediately reflected in the Premiere project. Their video editor (premiere) is well considered and is a go to option for a lot of people, particularly since apple made some unpopular changes to Final Cut Pro. The whole suite integrates graphics and video manipulation. PS: Great seeing OP back here!I don't see it as being that much out of their scope. I do have, however, CS6 on my 'puter, and I must admin I've used audition once of twice. I've always found it odd, that Adobe started doing thing 'out of their scope', like Video and audio. My DAW of choice right now is Samplitude, but Audition is my go to audio converter/quick editor. All the clips were edited with fade ins/outs in about 5 seconds) I did the process once, saved the sequence and imported all the files in the batch processor, loaded the favorite, and pressed run. (recently it had to create 30 second clips with fade ins and outs for hundreds of mp3s for web samples. (You can convert over an hours worth of material to any format in under 3 seconds.)ģ) Well laid out and easy to work with mutitrack editor.Ĥ) Awesome batch processor that can be set to run any combination of tasks with a single button. CS6 is kind of the proof of that if anyone has worked with the version that came with CS5.ġ) Fastest file conversion and export in the industry by far. Adobe is one of the best companies when it comes to updates, listening to customer complaints, and acknowledging errors. Sorry to be what sounds like I'm negative - but I think this very important! It's about using tools from specialists, that you can actually come in dialog with. In the meantime I'd rather use Izotopes RX3 for spectral editing and sample rate conversion, and other tools for time-streching. It's sad and hopefully this will change again at some point. The tools are good, often very good, but the company is behaving like an evil empire and they have a terrible update policy I reckon this is also why you post the issue here. The on/off tick is a good example, it's almost impossible to contact Adobe and make them acknowledge that there's a bug, because they are not meant to have a dialog with users, at least that's what I get out of it. Problem is that it's an Adobe Program, and they do simply not have the same level of service to customers as many fine DAW developers have. To my experience Adobe Audition CS 5,5, which is what I have, has many fine features. Also very happy to see Tony's back, Welcome Tony
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |