![]() (to understand this story, one has to understand the "flood story" from a geological standpoint).Īfter Abraham immorally had a heir, through Sarah's bondwoman, (for Sarah was barren), the heirship was corrupt in GOD's eyes. This line, by this union was not pure-blood. Should you choose to accept it, Hagar was not pure blood, but was of the "created" line from Caanan's seed, the father of the Caananite nations. (These are where all the Arab nations come from.) The pure-blood line of Adam, (from GOD), and Eve, of Adam. First-born of a bond-woman, Hagar Ismael was of illigitimate birth and was not in full partnership with the spirit/man concept of Adam. ![]() These people were divided naturally from a direct decendant of Adam, into two groups, from the sons of Abraham. This "tiny group of Semitic peoples", just happens to be, the only true lineage from Adam, that was imparted the inheritance from GOD. Where do the Christians get the audacity to believe this? Well, no response.I guess I will have to jump in with both feet.here goes.Īre Christians trying to tell us the creator of all the earth and father of all mankind has revealed himself and his will to a tiny group of Semitic Jewish people at the end of the Mediterranean Sea leaving the remainder of the world in ignorance. I soon found out having my kids and had to have that Rhogam shot in the back. Actually its doing my head in and it depends greatly on how much you read and research as to what you find out you cant just take the bibles word for it by the seem of things as there is far too much information missing. If these books were taken from the bible to cover up there being many Gods as in the book of Enoch. The point is depending on which lineage Jesus came from ie, the line of Seth or Cain would it make him of alien ancestory or not I suppose if all the information on Eden, Enki, Enlil etc are to be believed, never mind about Sitchin. The book of Gad the Seer (Gad was the son of Jacob)ġst Book of Chronicles, Chapter 29, Line 29: Now the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer,Ģnd Book of Chronicles, Chapter 9, Line 29: 29: Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat? In the bible people mention these books an example of which is as follows:ġSt book of Chronicles Chapter 29, Line29: Now the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer, The bible is full of holes.and missing books such as the book of Jasher to mention just the one, in fact there are about 8 that I know of. So perhaps it is not such a daft thing to imagine a race of people coming to Earth and genetically manipulating the early creatures thus creating a bloodline such as O, after all there is still a missing page in the evolutionary chapter that stumps us all. Aww now im cryin and confused.so people say that the Annunaki is a product of Sitchin and that Jesus was not an Anunnaki.and that we did evolve from apes.Hmmm Well even without the intervention of Sitchin.we have Sumerian cuneiform text that tells of visitors from another planet, they had solar system charts and all kinds of things.the question is though.where did O type blood come from as Apes do not have it.Gorilas dont have it and even chimps dont have it so where did O type blood come from if this evolutionary theory is to be believed.we all had to come from somewhere and so did O type blood.as you know O type blood can be given to other blood group types but not the other way about.there had to be a 3rd bloodline to allow for O group.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |